For details of what these pages are about, see these blog posts.
Return-Path: <returns-dee=jane.earlsoft.co.uk@baraneuryt.co.uk> Received: from smtp1.baraneuryt.co.uk ([76.73.26.34]) by jane.earlsoft.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r6TBfTZh013953 for <dee@jane.earlsoft.co.uk>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 11:41:29 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=default; d=baraneuryt.co.uk; h=To:From:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Date; i=contact@baraneuryt.co.uk; bh=CFvN5rtSmeY0mijABdnOkKoM+0c=; b=NC+/sbrSpXzHVqluk95cUs63qOIa1weRevP6aba9Ehzmw2X9C5has+XW7KLilQOmRzBXN2jzIMwL ZsV8Vz2caWlhJu3rwhStJgOtCB0irze3VHz2hEDYoIslfsKBlKZcB0Vvc9pUa87UuGba5Ka2dO+Q 10bXV/UN1mId70EgA/g= To: dee@jane.earlsoft.co.uk From: Deal with disruptive behaviour <contact@baraneuryt.co.uk> Subject: Are they playing up again? Message-ID: <4e0bcfbd6a5ed697fa0c9db90917c75e@baraneuryt.co.uk> X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="b1_4e0bcfbd6a5ed697fa0c9db90917c75e" Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 12:40:44 +0100 X-Greylist: Delayed for 00:10:03 by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (jane.earlsoft.co.uk [85.119.83.77]); Mon, 29 Jul 2013 11:41:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=6.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE,RDNS_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_DBL_SPAM shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Report: * 5.0 URIBL_DBL_SPAM Contains an URL listed in the DBL blocklist * [URIs: baraneuryt.co.uk] * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * 1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS X-Spam-Level: ****** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on spamd2.lon.bitfolk.com